ailbhe: (Default)
[personal profile] ailbhe
I just did a quick check.

Currently, I'm a healthy "weight", even according to the BMI people, who are insane and not terribly scientific.

If I were two stone lighter, I'd be clinically underweight. If I were two stone heavier, I'd be *barely scraping* overweight, according to the BMI people.

But I'm expected to join in conversations where the assumption is that weight loss is always a good thing, and something we should all strive for?

What's the stats on preteen anorexia again?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-04 07:09 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
I had a chat with my excellent old GP about BMI and she said she didn't think it was medically useful. It's designed for populations - i.e a whole country of people, NOT individuals. My GP reckoned the only time she ever used it was iff someone had a BMI of below 17 or 18 which was one of many warning signs for anorexia or other health problem.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-04 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sierra-le-oli.livejournal.com
Thank you for staving off my rant. :-)

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021222324 25
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags