Before we go to play in the summershine
Aug. 28th, 2005 09:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I was reading this livejournal snark community (mistake number one) and I saw a link to a parenting community and followed it (mistake number two) and I read some of the comments (mistake number three) and I saw one where a woman (supposedly a woman) had typed (unless it was the demons in her trousers) that - wait for it, get this, you'll love this -
"Every woman is born with enough of a tolerance to give birth without drugs." There, that's the quote. It's unattributed so no-one will go and track her down and kill her. There's another one: "Feeling you "can't" do it without drugs is a confidence issue, period. Because you can, everybody can otherwise the human race would have died out -- but it's all whether or not you have the confidence to acutally do it."
Excuse me please, I have to go vomit with rage now. Because I happen to be aware that the leading cause of death in women, until pretty damn recently, was birth. Yessir, the most natural thing in the world used to KILL PEOPLE. And I have no idea what the figures are for babies.
It's great that some people have labours and births they can get through without medical intervention, or without drugs, or without pain relief. My mother had four - and she only had pain relief on the first one because the doctors told her to and she didn't know any better. I'm sure I know other people who did it, too.
But some people would DIE if they did that. And so would their babies. DIE until they were DEAD.
And then, you know, they'd stay dead for a very long time.
So watch what you say. It might be bad for my blood pressure.
On that note, me and my baby - neither of whom died, because I allowed them to pump me full of noxious toxic risk-laden chemicals - are going to go play in the Botanic Gardens at Kew. And it will be lovely. We have a picnic.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:16 am (UTC)IMHO, every birth, every mother, every baby is unique. I've been very lucky to have two quite unremarkable confinements (gas and air doesn't make the pain go away but you care less).
Play in the summershine. Enjoy your family. You've earned it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:09 am (UTC)And enjoy Kew, it's a lovely place, I should really visit it again sometime.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 12:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 06:40 pm (UTC)The other thing about the supposed wonderfulness of natural childbirth is that, of course, before modern medicine there never was such a thing as professional midwives, oh, no, not at all, no need for that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:26 am (UTC)Um... Because that's how it works. Because everyone has to reproduce to make sure there are some babies to ensure the survival of the race. And everyone can conceive without help because that's a completely natural thing too, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:39 am (UTC)I spar with them on occasion, particularly the unassisted birthers. They don't like my story much because I really challenge their ideas that things only go wrong because of intervention. The reality is, things go wrong full stop. Sometimes things go wrong that can be fixed, like with you and L and the fact we have medical provision that can fix them is fantastic. Because less dead mothers and babies is obviously a very good thing indeed. You know if someone had said "if you have a c-section at 37 weeks we can guarantee you a healthy baby I'd probably have been in there like a shot. But of course they wouldn't say that when I quizzed them because sadly *thats* not true either.
A lot of people (and you see it elsewhere - birth nazis, boob nazis, etc) seem to have the difficulty with the concept that rare != never. A 5-10% rate for necessary sections (which seems to be the consensus) is a *heck* of a lot of necessary c-sections. Well into 5 figures per annum in the UK. There's probably as many births again, if not more, that *need* some form of intervention. IIRC the theoretical maximum normal birth rate is about 75%. Now, the problem is there are 3-4 times as many c-sections as are probably necessary taking place and trying to change that is laudable but you have to remember that the aim is not to stop all c-sections, its to prevent the unnecessary ones.
As to pain. :P to them Its something you see less here, IME. Certainly the UK homebirth groups don't focus on the "no pain relief" mantra, they just look at alternative forms of pain relief (like water, aromatherapy, massage, tens or gas and air). You very rarely see someone say they had *no* pain relief. Personally I could have kissed my midwife when she handed over the gas and air, both times, but there was *no way* that mouthpiece was coming out of my mouth for anything!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 03:46 pm (UTC)And while I don't particularly like narcotics, I loved the Pethidine in my second labour! I was kind of fond of my epidural in the first too, by the time I got it!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 11:19 am (UTC)I'll just get on the phone and pass that information on to my maternal grandmother. I'm sure *her* mother would be pleased to know it. It would, however, require a ouija board to get the information across, since my maternal great-grandmother died of a post-puerpal haemmorhage after giving birth to her eleventh child.
Yessir, the most natural thing in the world used to KILL PEOPLE. And I have no idea what the figures are for babies.
Still does, in fact. There's still a lot of countries where dying in childbirth is a leading cause of female and juvenile mortality.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 11:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 03:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 04:50 pm (UTC)In my case, I'm quite convinced that if I'd used pain medications during labor I would have had to have a C-section. I have an abnormally shaped pelvis due to lots of pelvic surgery, and to get my baby out my midwife really had to work with me on changing laboring positions, very specifically directed pushing angles... stuff I couldn't have done if I was woozy or numb from the waist down. Am I somehow a better woman or a better mother because I had an unmedicated birth? Hell, no. But there were sound medical reasons why I'm glad I was able to do it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 08:13 pm (UTC)Hindsight! It's the way to make sure all the most important medical choices are right...
But I found reading your birth story a very healing experience, when I was able to cope with birth stories again. And I thank you for posting it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:35 pm (UTC)I'm glad that my birth story was good for you to read. Very, very glad.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 09:38 pm (UTC)Hurrah for glad all around!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 11:46 pm (UTC)I think there are a lot of women who fear childbirth very much, and have no idea of how it could be anything other than overwhelmingly awful. That kind of fear and tension make it awfully damn hard to get through any kind of labor without pain medication. Does that mean they don't "need" it? I guess it depends on what you mean by "need."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 01:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 01:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 08:40 pm (UTC)My mother knows a woman who refused to care for her baby for two years after the birth because it hurt so much. The grandmother had to move in and do it. Two years is a long time in baby-years.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 07:52 pm (UTC)but then again what do i know i don't have a medical degree, but i do have a beautiful daughter how i am very very glad survived the experience even though she was born premature and blue.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 01:39 pm (UTC)...Damn it, I hate people who think that evolutionary fitness is about the survival of individuals, not the survival of the species.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 08:14 pm (UTC)I keep meaning to go in and ask them about that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-28 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 08:58 am (UTC)