This is about Obama's reaction to it.
The audience of news reporters burst into laughter.
The president also considered for a moment what would happen if he, like Gates, were unable to enter his home — the White House — and decided to force the door open. He concluded: “I’d get shot.” The audience of news reporters burst into laughter.
The audience of news reporters burst into laughter.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:52 am (UTC)The *only* reason what he was doing was deemed suspicious was because he is black. This is a blatant case of skin colour serving as the definition of criminality.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 06:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 09:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:25 am (UTC)The professor had just come back from a foreign trip, ended up struggling with his front door. Concerned citizen from down the road sees somebody trying to get in the door of a house where the owner is known to be away, calls the cops. Cops come and investigate. So far, everything's going exactly as it should.
The problem comes when the cops arrive. They successfully ID the professor as the resident, however there's some verbal aggro between them. Not actually having a CCTV camera there, I don't know who started it, but that's irrelevant anyway. At that point the police should have fucked off, but instead the copper decided to stand on his dignity and arrest the professor for disorderly conduct.
So yeah - stupid policeman, as Obama said. Copper deserves a reprimand, professor deserves an apology. Nobody got shot, nobody was ever likely to have been shot. The initial callout for suspected burglary was justified in my opinion, and doesn't look to me to be racially motivated.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:29 am (UTC)Copper deserves more than a reprimand. Copper 1) entered a dwelling without a warrant -- which, when he thought there was a burglar, was reasonable, but, as soon as he knew there wasn't, it became trespassing, and 2) falsely arrested a citizen when he KNEW there were no grounds for it. Copper committed two criminal actions.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:36 am (UTC)After that, though, the police should have backed off. They had proof that the prof was in his own house.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:47 am (UTC)(2) is almost certainly true, though let's be clear that he was arrested for creating a disturbance, not for burglary, and that he was arrested outside his home, having followed the cop out shouting at him. In a hypothetical scenario where the professor had decked the cop, then the cop would be justified in arresting him for assault, say. Breach of the peace is much more nebulous though, and probably comes down to "insulting a cop" - which of course it shouldn't.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:57 am (UTC)That the cops behaved criminally is indubitable; that their behavious was motivated by racism is likely; and that the while incident simply wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for race, is likely.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:11 pm (UTC)That said, sounds like these cops were out of line b/c they shouldn't have arrested him after he showed ID!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:44 pm (UTC)Racial profiling doesn't work in the easily recognisable, bludgeon to the head way of "hang, on, aren't I forgetting something? Oh yeah, I'm a racist! D'uh, must call cops, brown person on loose!". It's such a complicated and painful issue exactly because it's usually an aggregate of a lot of subtle reactions from people: the neighbour's reaction to seeing two black men in a predominantly white neighbourhood; the cops' reaction to same; Gates's own reaction to the cops; their reaction to his anger (the least defensible bit of the story, since they knew his anger was in fact justified).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:55 pm (UTC)Don't get me wrong - I still think that from the publicly available information, this particular case of the professor and the police comes down WAY in favor of the professor. I just ALSO think that a some of the things that went down were appropriate, but then they got out of control.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 03:14 pm (UTC)There seems to be this extreme divide between policing of the absent/brutal variety (typically in areas where their active engagement with the community would come with the most lives saved) or policing that is a servant of middle and upper class prejudice (which this case, with all its subtelties, is nevertheless emblematic of).
It's not that different in the UK, although potentially less polarised along racial lines (then again, I'm definitely not in a position to give informed opinion about race relations in Britain). On the one hand you've got cops harassing teenagers for wearing hooded sweatshirts and killing protesters and bistanders during legal demonstrations, on the other you've got the complete inability and unwillingness of the police to investigate and respond to actual crimes like rape, where we have one of the lowest rates in the west of complaints that result in prosecution.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 03:04 pm (UTC)It wasn't hilarious, but it wasn't a bad thing to say.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 10:32 am (UTC)The "shooting" thing was not about him being black, but was intended to be a comment about White House security. And it was intended to be funny, and was funny.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-23 12:10 pm (UTC)