DW/LJ crossposts
Jun. 10th, 2009 08:25 pmI had my first irritation at fragmented discussion today. I'm now considering directing LJ readers to comment at my Dreamwidth journal. But I don't want to do that either.
Other than that, I'm considering sending some of the less feelgood pomes to a local publisher. Can I handle rejection? I'm not very good at rejection, but this is a small local cooperative, so I looooove them.
Other than that, I'm considering sending some of the less feelgood pomes to a local publisher. Can I handle rejection? I'm not very good at rejection, but this is a small local cooperative, so I looooove them.
Re: DW/LJ crossposts
Date: 2009-06-10 09:45 pm (UTC)Re: DW/LJ crossposts
Date: 2009-06-11 03:33 am (UTC)(You were pretty harsh with me last time I tried to explain this, and I decided not to respond to you. Please don't be harsh with me about it this time, because I'm certain I'm not articulating it all that well, but I'm willing to keep trying unless you go all sarcastic and insulty on me again.)
Re: DW/LJ crossposts
Date: 2009-06-11 05:00 am (UTC)this paragraph isn't about you: i _do_ know people who have an anti-DW thing, and they tick me off because they make a big deal about having to go to DW to post, but the very same peple go and comment on blogs elsewhere, which is considerably more effort. i am disinclined to accomodate those much longer. if they want to stop talking to me as a punishment for me leaving LJ, well, be that way. it seems juvenile to me. i make an effort to reply to people wherever they make their home on the net -- i wish that were easier(google wave, maybe), and i don't do it as much as i probably should, but i do try.
i think i see what you mean about the weirdness. i felt some weirdness originally, especially when i was talking a lot about how great dreamwidth is. but i stopped doing that; and am in fact explicitly no longer crossposting DW-specific things. so i don't see it the same way anymore, because:
- i am still paying for my LJ account.
- i'm not crossposting primarily for my own benefit; i'm doing it for the people who're not moving. some of it is for my benefit too -- because i don't want to necessarily lose touch, and i am willing to do my share to not let that happen. but there's a limit to what i consider "my share" to be; repeating myself in comments starts to feel like too much.
- i will basically be doing the same thing a feed does, except i actually have power over the account, unlike a feed, which sucks (as you have just noticed yourself). do you think feeds are also weird? i mean, LJ actively facilitates them.
i hope that wasn't too harsh? (i am serious; i sometimes can't tell.)
Re: DW/LJ crossposts
Date: 2009-06-11 05:24 am (UTC)I do think feeds are a little weird, and yet I love them. I think that comparing crossposting-without-comments to a feed is helpful to me; thank you.
Re: DW/LJ crossposts
Date: 2009-06-11 05:31 am (UTC)but i could have said that less harshly, really. that smiley tacked onto the end didn't make up for the ratt-tat-tat tone of the whole thing.
i am sorry it made you cry. *gnarg*. i hate doing that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-11 07:24 pm (UTC)I think regarding LJ/DW, I will keep with the crossposting, since it's so easy, but then I haven't run into the fragmented-discussion thing. It might be because... well, partly because I've not blogged recently (by the time I catch up with blogs I am knackered). Partly because I learn of all comments via email, so the discussion always *is* fragmented. Partly because I don't post very much that would lead to discussion.
Without naming names, what was the aspect of fragmented discussion that was annoying?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-10 08:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-11 12:16 am (UTC)The Pomes
Date: 2009-06-14 10:01 pm (UTC)Daphne xx
Re: The Pomes
Date: 2009-06-14 10:09 pm (UTC)After all, incompetence and self-doubt aren't ALWAYS mutually exclusive!