I also heard an interview with a woman who was waiting for her brother outside the hotel.
"He is in there, I don't know where he is, I am just waiting."
The BBC interviewer said "And is he - does he work at the hotel?"
"No," she said, somewhat flatly. "He is a [management or higher position, I forget]."
The interviewer had the gall to sound surprised.
"He is in there, I don't know where he is, I am just waiting."
The BBC interviewer said "And is he - does he work at the hotel?"
"No," she said, somewhat flatly. "He is a [management or higher position, I forget]."
The interviewer had the gall to sound surprised.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 10:18 am (UTC)The real point is that the rumours - and they are rumours only, denied so far by both UK and India's PMs - that some of the attackers may or may not have *any* kind of connection to the UK were still very tenuous at the time the Guardian piece was written, and they should have known better than to make an unconditional headline out of them.
Instead, the most liberal and left leaning newspaper in the country carefully chose language that disowned these alleged people of whatever nationality, just in case.
Nice.