Parenting: A career choice
Sep. 29th, 2005 02:15 pmToday I have, again, seen someone say that no-one chooses parenting as a career, and that they've never known an intelligent person who wanted to be a full-time parent, and that parenting isn't a full-time ob after the child is [arbitrary age - in this case 6 years old].
And I've spent my free time this morning reading about home education, because I am increasingly unhappy with the idea of formal schooling.
I also wrote the following in someone else's journal:
Practically all of what I've learned in the past year is to trust myself.
If I'd insisted that I was in labour when I was in labour, for example. When I think we need to buy a [safety equipment] because Linnea is about to [suicidal thing]. That the funny breathing thing is a bit odd. The dairy thing. The potty thing. All of it - it's down to trusting that what I think is right is adequate to act on, and not referring to other, less-qualified persons for instruction.
And a big part of how I got *there* was changing from "this whole baby thing is my personal life, at which I am incompetent" to "this whole baby thing is my job, at which I am fabulously competent."
OK, *after* having a baby is a bit late to learn this, maybe, but she seems to be surviving so far.
I approached full-time parenting as a job from the start. While I was pregnant I learned to keep house - that is, I learned to keep house tidy, rather than just keep house solvent, which I've been good at for a while. Because I wouldn't let Linnea go to a childminder with a dirty house, so my house has to be clean if that's where she's going to be. I learned about breastpumps and cloth nappies, and local schools, and I went to all the antenatal classes offered and deliberately formed a social network of other mums at the classes so that I would have a social network of parents after the birth. And after she was born I kept oining and forming and researching and so on.
And I got precious little time off for illness - though I did get some, when all I had to do was be operated on or feed.
And my baby is almost 17 months old (tomorrow!) and will play alone, unsupervised, for up to an hour, sometimes. So she's not suffocated with attention. She will also play nicely with babies her own age, mobile babies much younger than she is, and children up to some arbitrary age - we haven't found a limit yet. She is wary of strangers at first but friendly once introduced. She does not demand constant constant attention, though I do have to be constantly available - always on call, if you like.
In other words, I am doing a good job and I have a great kid and she hasn't suffered in the least from not being at nursery - and I haven't suffered much from not going to a "proper job", because there's no way I'd have found one far enough away from her nursery that I could nap at lunchtime, and that's the only thing I miss about a proper job - lunchbreaks, where one is no longer on call.
She's asleep in her very own bed now. I'm knitting her coat and pottering about online. When she wakes up we're going to wash the floors and then head off to softplay, most likely. Today would be a swimming day if I didn't have a period.
11 days to the gynaecologist appointment. Ho hum.