How To Have A Moral Code Without Religion
Feb. 26th, 2011 11:41 pmI'm mainly thinking of the tweet I've seen forwarded around everywhere - something along the lines of "The Pope says atheists can just pick and choose which morals to have, so today I will choose to frown on the rape of children and think homosexuality is fine."
I seem to have a pretty strict moral code, one way or another. I don't live up to it, of course. I think that if I did it would be a sign to me that it wasn't strict enough.
But when I was four my mother explained to me how fare-evasion on buses was theft, not from the bus company, but from everyone else who used the buses, because their fares all get a little bit larger to make up for the missed fares of non-payers.
She's a bit of a communist hippie type, my mum. A very respectable communist hippie type.
We used to pick up rubbish on our way home from the beach. We composted biodegradable waste, and used non-fatal rat repelling things instead of traps. Off-hand I can think of twice when we gave shelter to desperate people with nowhere to go. We didn't waste things. Two of her children were vegetarian for years until separate and unrelated health issues stopped them. We've all been boycotting Nestlé for about as long as I can remember (she also boycotted Cadburys a bit, not very thoroughly, because they were one of the companies which sacked women on marriage). She gave us books and encouraged us to watch films about race - mainly American ones about black Americans, because that's what we had access to, but in Ireland in the 1980s it wasn't wholly usual.
Of course, I took a lot of this upbringing and brought it to extremes. Local organic this, fair-trade ethically-sourced that, recycled the other.
I think it boils down to the need for good people to not do nothing. I question pretty much everything I do (I am trying very hard not to think about the processes involved in paint manufacture and distribution, though). I try to give my children the space to make their own decisions while letting them know what I think is the right thing to do.
In general I feel like a loony extremist; one thing that has been nice about True Food Co-op and Quakers is that I'm relatively normal there.
I seem to have a pretty strict moral code, one way or another. I don't live up to it, of course. I think that if I did it would be a sign to me that it wasn't strict enough.
But when I was four my mother explained to me how fare-evasion on buses was theft, not from the bus company, but from everyone else who used the buses, because their fares all get a little bit larger to make up for the missed fares of non-payers.
She's a bit of a communist hippie type, my mum. A very respectable communist hippie type.
We used to pick up rubbish on our way home from the beach. We composted biodegradable waste, and used non-fatal rat repelling things instead of traps. Off-hand I can think of twice when we gave shelter to desperate people with nowhere to go. We didn't waste things. Two of her children were vegetarian for years until separate and unrelated health issues stopped them. We've all been boycotting Nestlé for about as long as I can remember (she also boycotted Cadburys a bit, not very thoroughly, because they were one of the companies which sacked women on marriage). She gave us books and encouraged us to watch films about race - mainly American ones about black Americans, because that's what we had access to, but in Ireland in the 1980s it wasn't wholly usual.
Of course, I took a lot of this upbringing and brought it to extremes. Local organic this, fair-trade ethically-sourced that, recycled the other.
I think it boils down to the need for good people to not do nothing. I question pretty much everything I do (I am trying very hard not to think about the processes involved in paint manufacture and distribution, though). I try to give my children the space to make their own decisions while letting them know what I think is the right thing to do.
In general I feel like a loony extremist; one thing that has been nice about True Food Co-op and Quakers is that I'm relatively normal there.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:03 am (UTC)And as you point out, religions that have engaged in child abuse and rape are currently having a bit of a public relations crisis about being a good source of morality (even if they're sometimes pretending not to notice).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-28 01:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 01:58 am (UTC)That resonated with me as an unhappily Fundamentalist Christian teenager, and resonates with me as an agnostic who spends a lot of time in dialogue with her conscience. For me, no longer being a Christian doesn't mean I get to choose my morality via whims and conveniences; it means I need to practice it according to what I know of humanity and what I can reasonably conclude is the greatest good, rather than according to an outside authority named "Jesus" (or at least what other authorities have told me He says).
Also, I love your mother, sight unseen. *hugs you to transmit to her* *hugs you for yourself*
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 09:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 12:40 pm (UTC)I (as can everyone) can pick and choose whether to be a Christian, just as much as I can choose to let my morality be guided by what I consider right. Personally I don't have any gripe with Jesus, even as often strangely reported in the Gospels, but as someone who does have morals I can't stomach the so called 'moral laws' of many who claim to be his followers, e.g. the Pope and many Anglican bishops, so find it hard to accept that so many no doubt decent individuals can sign up to be guided by the such offensive nonsense.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:05 pm (UTC)My mother and I don't hug much. It's one of the things that got damaged somewhere along the way. I'm trying to reinstate it.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-27 08:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-28 08:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-28 11:39 am (UTC)Any large scale moral system offers the same pitfalls: people in democratic countries tend to be much less sensitive to their own countries' abuses of human rights than to those in other places. That sort of thing.
The thing about atheism (or for me, more precisely, Existentialism) is that you don't have anyone to give you cover for your every day choices. You can't be a "good" atheist, which means each individual action is up for examination for its goodness on its own terms.
So in that sense yes, atheists "can" pick and choose their morals; what makes them more moral than religious people, however, is that they *have* to.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-28 11:42 am (UTC)That guy sends shivers of mixed fear, rage and disgust all up and down my spine.