ailbhe: (Default)
[personal profile] ailbhe
I'm mainly thinking of the tweet I've seen forwarded around everywhere - something along the lines of "The Pope says atheists can just pick and choose which morals to have, so today I will choose to frown on the rape of children and think homosexuality is fine."

I seem to have a pretty strict moral code, one way or another. I don't live up to it, of course. I think that if I did it would be a sign to me that it wasn't strict enough.

But when I was four my mother explained to me how fare-evasion on buses was theft, not from the bus company, but from everyone else who used the buses, because their fares all get a little bit larger to make up for the missed fares of non-payers.

She's a bit of a communist hippie type, my mum. A very respectable communist hippie type.

We used to pick up rubbish on our way home from the beach. We composted biodegradable waste, and used non-fatal rat repelling things instead of traps. Off-hand I can think of twice when we gave shelter to desperate people with nowhere to go. We didn't waste things. Two of her children were vegetarian for years until separate and unrelated health issues stopped them. We've all been boycotting Nestlé for about as long as I can remember (she also boycotted Cadburys a bit, not very thoroughly, because they were one of the companies which sacked women on marriage). She gave us books and encouraged us to watch films about race - mainly American ones about black Americans, because that's what we had access to, but in Ireland in the 1980s it wasn't wholly usual.

Of course, I took a lot of this upbringing and brought it to extremes. Local organic this, fair-trade ethically-sourced that, recycled the other.

I think it boils down to the need for good people to not do nothing. I question pretty much everything I do (I am trying very hard not to think about the processes involved in paint manufacture and distribution, though). I try to give my children the space to make their own decisions while letting them know what I think is the right thing to do.

In general I feel like a loony extremist; one thing that has been nice about True Food Co-op and Quakers is that I'm relatively normal there.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-27 08:03 am (UTC)
aquaeri: My nose is being washed by my cat (Default)
From: [personal profile] aquaeri
I've never quite understood the "you have to have a religion to have a moral code" argument in the first place. I seem to remember ancient Greek philosophers pointing out that we all come with internal moral judgement, so if a god appears in front of us and demands to be worshipped and gives us a moral code that includes child sacrifice, we can judge that moral code to be wrong. Ergo, religion is unncessary, even if one believed god/s were real and the source of religion and morality. (I'm very much of the "religion is obviously a human invention" school myself.)

And as you point out, religions that have engaged in child abuse and rape are currently having a bit of a public relations crisis about being a good source of morality (even if they're sometimes pretending not to notice).

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-28 01:03 am (UTC)
aquaeri: My nose is being washed by my cat (Default)
From: [personal profile] aquaeri
Interesting. I know a lot of other religious arguments are fear-and-hate, but it hadn't occurred to me that that one might be. I'll have to think about that.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-27 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] browngirl.livejournal.com
*nods vigorously* Do you remember some weeks ago when many of the Americans on LJ talking about Huckleberry Finn? One of the key points in that book (the point that resonated with me and made me glad I winced my way through it) was when the titular protagonist decides that he'd rather go to Hell for 'stealing' a slave he's helping run away, than live by the soi-disant Christian precepts he's been taught that deem theft a sin and slaves not human.

That resonated with me as an unhappily Fundamentalist Christian teenager, and resonates with me as an agnostic who spends a lot of time in dialogue with her conscience. For me, no longer being a Christian doesn't mean I get to choose my morality via whims and conveniences; it means I need to practice it according to what I know of humanity and what I can reasonably conclude is the greatest good, rather than according to an outside authority named "Jesus" (or at least what other authorities have told me He says).

Also, I love your mother, sight unseen. *hugs you to transmit to her* *hugs you for yourself*
Edited Date: 2011-02-27 02:05 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-27 08:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiggsybabes.livejournal.com
My parents are both environmentalists, so we were brought up to re-use carrier bags, pick up other people's rubbish & recycle long, long before it became "fashionable" We were the werdos doing the weekly shop with our own carrier bags.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-27 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cangetmad.livejournal.com
My mum was a Tory, but a Tory who believed that, if you didn't do something about a problem, who did you expect to do it? So she made food for families with a member in hospital, she cleaned up sick at work even though she was "senior management", she picked up litter in the street. And I am just like her, only I'm a commie.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-27 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-musing-amazon.livejournal.com
"The Pope says atheists can just pick and choose which morals to have".

I (as can everyone) can pick and choose whether to be a Christian, just as much as I can choose to let my morality be guided by what I consider right. Personally I don't have any gripe with Jesus, even as often strangely reported in the Gospels, but as someone who does have morals I can't stomach the so called 'moral laws' of many who claim to be his followers, e.g. the Pope and many Anglican bishops, so find it hard to accept that so many no doubt decent individuals can sign up to be guided by the such offensive nonsense.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-28 08:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiggsybabes.livejournal.com
Yup, same here :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-28 11:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com
It's easier to be hypocritical when you're religious; and I mean hypocritical inthe literal sense of the word, "not sufficiently critical of one's own actions as compared to similar actions in others". You've got this bit umbrella cover of Official Goodness(tm) and it's only natural that people let all kinds of inconsistencies & cognitive dissonance slip through.

Any large scale moral system offers the same pitfalls: people in democratic countries tend to be much less sensitive to their own countries' abuses of human rights than to those in other places. That sort of thing.

The thing about atheism (or for me, more precisely, Existentialism) is that you don't have anyone to give you cover for your every day choices. You can't be a "good" atheist, which means each individual action is up for examination for its goodness on its own terms.

So in that sense yes, atheists "can" pick and choose their morals; what makes them more moral than religious people, however, is that they *have* to.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-28 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com
Who's currently urging doctors to deny women abortions, apparently. Except when the women involved are nuns who've been raped by priests, one assumes.

That guy sends shivers of mixed fear, rage and disgust all up and down my spine.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags