Letter to PALS
Jan. 3rd, 2013 02:05 pmHi,
While at my pre-op today for a gynaecological issue I saw a notice up asking that staff remind women to shave before surgery. I asked the nurse if I should shave, and she said no, but that the consultant preferred "ladies" to "tidy the garden."
The consultant's aesthetic preferences are not a patient's concern, and should never be made a patient's concern, and if there is no surgical need - no incision within the hairline, etc - then there is no medical requirement to depilate. Genital exposure is personal enough without bringing the surgeon's personal aesthetic preferences into it.
I have a personal preference for a gynaecologist who can cope with normal adult female anatomy.
A.
While at my pre-op today for a gynaecological issue I saw a notice up asking that staff remind women to shave before surgery. I asked the nurse if I should shave, and she said no, but that the consultant preferred "ladies" to "tidy the garden."
The consultant's aesthetic preferences are not a patient's concern, and should never be made a patient's concern, and if there is no surgical need - no incision within the hairline, etc - then there is no medical requirement to depilate. Genital exposure is personal enough without bringing the surgeon's personal aesthetic preferences into it.
I have a personal preference for a gynaecologist who can cope with normal adult female anatomy.
A.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 03:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-04 06:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:12 pm (UTC)And they actually said GARDEN???????
Good for your letter.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 11:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:26 pm (UTC)Ailbhe: I have found PALS at my local hospital responsive to feedback about some access issues I've had with them and the hospital in general so I hope your PALS is equally sensible.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:43 pm (UTC)I think it's a good letter, although I've seen advice to be clear in complaints letters about what you want to happen next. Do you want to re-arrange your appointment with a different consultant, or to make sure that any future appointments are with a different consultant, or to make sure that the nurse you spoke to and the consultant you are seeing are given training on what normal human genitalia look like? I think you tend to get a quicker and more effective response if they can see what you want them to *do*, even if it's just to say, "we can't do that, but we are doing this".
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 02:49 pm (UTC)Thank you for writing the letter. I am VERY ANGRY just reading it second-hand.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 03:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 04:40 pm (UTC)Thank you for writing that letter. Goddamn that arrogant man.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 10:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-03 11:36 pm (UTC)Sorry, I am kind of running out of words.
All I can say is YES you are so right.
And NO, that request from the hospital, or any request of it's kind, is absolutely inappropriate and downright wrong. Like morally wrong. Women get to be any way we wish to be regarding our public hair. And for it to be required to be otherwise for any reason other than medical is... [I've actually just been trying to work out how the prescribed removal of body hair must actually breach our human rights in some way, but I am can't work out which article that would come under in the Convention. Surely we have a right to freedom about this?]
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-04 07:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-04 09:04 am (UTC)Thank you for writing the letter.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-01-04 01:06 pm (UTC)