ailbhe: (wedding)
ailbhe ([personal profile] ailbhe) wrote2003-06-11 02:30 pm

Good things do happen

  • No-one has tried to tell us who we must invite.
  • No-one has tried to tell us that we must get married in a church. Well, there was one of three parents who was slightly disappointed, I think, but got over it or decided it was our business.
  • Only one person has expressed surprise that I'm not changing my name, and that person appears to have accepted it now.
  • The food will be more interesting than at most weddings, if not actually better quality.
  • I don't have to wear a frilly dress. My dress is very plain and no-one is trying to make me wear a fancy one.
  • The champagne will be drinkable and there will be enough of it.
  • There will be enough food and tea and coffee.
  • Cash bars are ok nowadays, even if I feel churlish for not having free fizzy drinks all day. I've never been to a wedding where there were free soft drinks apart from at the meal itself, as far as I can remember.
  • The gift issue isn't really an issue; there is only one person - ok, me too, so two persons - making an issue of it. The other 70-odd people seem quite happy.

[identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 07:02 am (UTC)(link)
We had free soft drinks at ours, but mainly because we were horrified at the prices the hotel bar wanted to charge (much worse than pub prices), and worked out that if we got it all on Buy One Get One Free offers at Sainsburys or wherever, the total for buying it in, plus the corkage charge, worked out cheaper than our buying everyone one small drink each - the original plan had been to put some cash behind the bar for our evening guests, since they'd not had drinks with dinner like everyone else had. Over half our guests were under 18 or teetotal (Methodists) so this was definitely the better option. (And those who wanted to get drunk still did even at the hotel bar prices, so that's their lookout.) It's definitely not expected though, and ours is the only wedding I've heard of it at, too.

[identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
. . . cash bars are okay now? Since when?

[identity profile] radegund.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 08:22 am (UTC)(link)
Piece in last Saturday's Irish Times says couples now routinely spend up to €20,000 on their wedding - a vast proportion of this on drink for the reception. I didn't read the article (just squawked over its contents with [livejournal.com profile] glitzfrau, who relayed the gist to me), so I've no idea whether this implies that cash bars are In or Out here.

I suspect it has to do with the Celtic Tiger "We Must Have Everything Right Now" mentality (one increases one's mortgage to raise the funds, natch) - and possibly the milling platoons of relatives who must be accommodated, particularly at rural weddings. (We're going to a swanky do in Leitrim in August - I do believe they were talking about 300 guests...)

Or...I don't know...maybe you too are sinking a hefty five-figure sum on this, and I'm just hopelessly unrealistic...

Crassly talking prices

[identity profile] micheinnz.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
$NZ 1 == about Euro 0.5. So yes, weddings will be cheaper here. Ours cost about $NZ 2500, all up, but we mostly did things ourselves.
ext_9215: (Default)

[identity profile] hfnuala.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
Other than possibly some wine with the meal, cash bars have always been OK at weddings in Ireland.

[identity profile] astrogeek.livejournal.com 2003-06-11 08:26 am (UTC)(link)
I've been to 5 weddings in the last 3 years, and all of them had cash bars apart from a glass of wine with the dinner and a glass of champagne for the toast. I thought this was the norm anyway, unless the couple had money to burn.