rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)

[personal profile] rmc28 2009-02-02 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually the important question is what's the absolute percentage, not the change.

If 2% of children raised by two cohabiting parents suffer one or more of these things, and 3% of children raised by separated/single/step parents do ... that's a 50% increase in likelihood by being raised by 1 parent rather than 2.

But that still means the vast majority of ALL kids are doing really well.

If they were talking 20% and 30% that's more worrying, but still means 70% of single-parented kids are just fine thank you very much.

Percentage difference is useless without absolute figures to put the difference in context.

[identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com 2009-02-02 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Word.

Also, how *dare* they lump in step parents with absent parents? Children with step parents are raised by two parent, you bastards!

And and and, did you notice how insiduously they deploy the "50%" figure to make it seem to the casual peruser that half of all kids from non-standrad families have these sorts of problems??

*fume*